Ind AS 2 vs AS 2 Inventories: Every Difference CA Students Must Know

Inventories looks like a simple topic — goods sitting in a warehouse. But once you sit in the exam hall, the difference between Ind AS 2 and AS 2 can quietly cost you marks if you have not sorted them out in your head. Let me walk you through every important difference, one clean point at a time.

---

Why Two Standards for the Same Topic?

India follows a dual reporting framework. Companies following the Indian GAAP route use AS 2 (issued by ICAI). Companies required to follow Indian Accounting Standards (converged with IFRS) use Ind AS 2. For CA Intermediate students studying both sets of standards — and for CA Final students dealing with Ind AS — knowing exactly where the two diverge is non-negotiable.

---

The Core Definition: Are They Different?

Both standards define inventories similarly — assets held for sale in the ordinary course of business, in the process of production for such sale, or in the form of materials or supplies to be consumed in the production process or in the rendering of services.

However, Ind AS 2 explicitly includes service-related work-in-progress (the costs of services for which revenue has not yet been recognised). AS 2 is largely silent on this nuance. This is your first difference — scope.

---

Scope Exclusions: A Bigger List Under Ind AS 2

Both standards exclude certain items, but Ind AS 2 has a more detailed exclusion list:

  • Financial instruments are excluded under Ind AS 2 (AS 2 does not mention this expressly because AS 2 pre-dates the detailed financial instruments standards).
  • Biological assets related to agricultural activity and agricultural produce at the point of harvest are excluded under Ind AS 2, covered instead by Ind AS 41. AS 2 has no such parallel exclusion.
  • Producer inventories of minerals, mineral products, and commodity broker-traders can measure at NRV under Ind AS 2 even when that differs from cost, with the difference going to profit or loss. AS 2 does not carve out this exception.

---

Cost Measurement: Where the Real Action Is

Borrowing Costs

This is a classic exam point. Under AS 2, borrowing costs are never part of inventory cost — full stop. Under Ind AS 2, borrowing costs can be included in the cost of inventories that are qualifying assets (i.e., they take a substantial period of time to get ready). Ind AS 2 cross-references Ind AS 23 (Borrowing Costs) for this. So a distillery ageing whisky for three years, for instance, could include borrowing costs under Ind AS 2 — not under AS 2.

Cost of Purchase

Both standards agree on this broadly — purchase price plus import duties, transport, handling, less trade discounts and rebates. No material difference here.

Cost Formulas Allowed

Here is a critical difference:

| Point | AS 2 | Ind AS 2 | |---|---|---| | FIFO | ✅ Allowed | ✅ Allowed | | Weighted Average | ✅ Allowed | ✅ Allowed | | LIFO | ✅ Allowed | ❌ Prohibited | | Specific Identification | ✅ Allowed | ✅ Allowed (for non-interchangeable items) |

LIFO (Last In First Out) is banned under Ind AS 2. This aligns Ind AS with IFRS globally. Under AS 2, LIFO was historically permitted, though it was already mentioned as not ordinarily acceptable in practice. Verify the exact current wording in the latest ICAI study material, but the broad principle — LIFO disallowed under Ind AS 2 — is firmly established.

---

Net Realisable Value (NRV): Important Nuances

Both standards say inventories must be measured at the lower of cost and NRV. But there are subtle differences in how NRV is applied:

  • Under Ind AS 2, when finished goods are above NRV, that is evidence that the raw materials used to produce them may also need to be written down — but the replacement cost of raw materials can be the best measure of NRV for raw materials. AS 2 uses a similar logic but does not articulate this linkage as clearly.
  • Reversal of write-down: Under Ind AS 2, if circumstances that caused the write-down no longer exist, the write-down must be reversed. Under AS 2, reversal is permitted but the standard's language is less mandatory in tone. In practice, both allow reversal — but Ind AS 2 frames it as a requirement.

---

Disclosure Requirements

Ind AS 2 demands richer disclosures:

  • The carrying amount of inventories carried at fair value less costs to sell (for broker-trader inventories).
  • Inventories recognised as an expense during the period (i.e., cost of goods sold broken down) — this is explicitly required.
  • The amount of any reversal of write-down and the circumstances that led to it.

AS 2 disclosures are simpler and fewer in number.

---

Quick-Reference Summary Table

| Difference | AS 2 | Ind AS 2 | |---|---|---| | LIFO method | Permitted | Prohibited | | Borrowing costs in inventory | Not allowed | Allowed (qualifying assets) | | Service WIP | Not explicitly covered | Explicitly included | | Biological assets exclusion | Not mentioned | Explicitly excluded | | Broker-trader NRV exception | Not available | Available | | Write-down reversal | Permitted | Required (mandatory) | | Disclosure depth | Basic | Detailed |

---

A Worked Logic Example

Imagine a company manufactures wine and ages it for 18 months (a qualifying period).

  • Under AS 2: Borrowing costs on funds used to finance this ageing cannot be added to inventory cost.
  • Under Ind AS 2: Those borrowing costs can be capitalised as part of inventory cost, making the cost of inventory higher, gross profit lower in the year of sale.

Also, this company cannot use LIFO under Ind AS 2 even if it wanted to — full stop.

---

FAQs

Q1. Can a company using Ind AS 2 use LIFO if its industry traditionally follows it? No. Ind AS 2 prohibits LIFO without any industry exception. All entities under Ind AS must use either FIFO or Weighted Average (or Specific Identification for non-interchangeable items).

Q2. Under Ind AS 2, is a write-down reversal optional or mandatory? It is mandatory. When the circumstances that led to the NRV write-down no longer exist, Ind AS 2 requires the reversal to be recognised. Under AS 2, the language is more permissive. Always verify the exact wording in the latest ICAI study material.

Q3. I am studying CA Intermediate (Old/New Scheme) — which standard applies to me? CA Intermediate broadly covers AS 2 under the Financial Reporting paper and introduces Ind AS concepts progressively. CA Final covers Ind AS 2 in depth. Check the latest ICAI study material / announcement for your specific scheme's syllabus.

---

Getting these differences absolutely clear in your mind before the exam takes maybe two focused revision sessions — but those sessions pay back many times over in marks. To make those sessions count, build your daily revision schedule using the free day-by-day study planner at caparveensharma.com/free-planner?src=article. And to test yourself on inventory case scenarios that actually mirror exam patterns, explore the free case-scenario practice available at caparveensharma.com — where CA Parveen Sharma's 36 years of teaching experience is packed into every course and resource waiting for you.